Tuesday, November 18, 2008

No Chlorine in Drinking Water!!

No Chlorine in Drinking Water - A blessing or Curse?

On November 13, 2008 Nyasa times carried an article titled ‘Lilongwe consuming water not chlorinated’. The article alleged that Lilongwe Water Board do not have enough funds for purchasing Chlorine to ensure safe drinking for the residents in the city. The Public Relation officer, a Mr Masauko Mngwaluko could not deny or confirm the reports.

However the iron of the issues is, while the article states that the water company had no enough funds to purchase the so called life saver, the government has given a go ahead for the construction of the water tower at Chikungu alone M1 road. This water tower is to serve the expanding areas of the city toward Nanjiri and its cost so huge more than what is required for chlorine purchase.

I find the information rather contradicting and confusing. When the water board say it has no enough funds to buy what is considered as a necessitate for safe drinking, what is it trying to mean? What has been the use of the money the residents of the city have been paying as consumption bills? What is the priority of the LWB – meeting the current need or ignoring them and adding more burden which it cannot bear?

In resource limiting situation always decisions are made to manage by deduction or opportunity cost. Is it fair that the board saw it fit above all other options available but to put the life of the residents at risk!? Was this so called unsafe water supplied to all areas equally or some areas were given special consideration?

Moreover, this brings the need of monitoring what the consumers are given. Who monitors the quality of water the water boards in Malawi are supplying to the residents? Is trust enough to be accounted and trusted in all cases? Why Lilongwe Water board, if the story is true, never disclose the situation that the resident can take other measures of treating water? Does this mean that the water company feels bigger and enjoys asymmetry of information and benefits more from the mal-practice? Consumer Association of Malawi! What are they saying over this issue? Malawi Bureau of Standards, what is they take?

On the other hand, if the story reported is true, why in the so called three weeks without safe water there have been no outbreaks of water related, borne, and carried diseases? Should we say that water from Lilongwe river which begins in the foot of Dzalanyama range is safe and does not need any more artificial treatment? Is the chlorine the board has been using really chlorine? Is it worthy using chlorine?

It is believed, as it has been stated in the Nyasa article, that the use of Chlorine is safe. The idea of Chlorination to make drinking water safe was denied in USA and elsewhere. Studies show that the use of Chlorine in drinking water facilitates the formation of carcinogenic elements which has been responsible for cancer cases. Further to that, Moseby’s medical dictionary says "Chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times. It is an insidious poison". So, is the use of chlorine necessary? Should the whine when it is not used?

Listen to what experts are saying about Chlorine and chlorination (source: Pure Earth Technologies)

"The drinking of chlorinated water has finally been officially linked to an increased incidence of colon cancer. An epidemiologist at Oak Ridge Associated Universities completed a study of colon cancer victims and non-cancer patients and concluded that the drinking of chlorinated water for 15 years or more was conducive to a high rate of colon cancer."

Health Freedom News, January/February 1987

"Long-term drinking of chlorinated water appears to increase a person's risk of developing bladder cancer as much as 80%," according to a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Some 45,000 Americans are diagnosed every year with bladder cancer.

St. Paul Dispatch & Pioneer Press, December 17, 1987

"Although concentrations of these carcinogens are low...it is precisely these low levels which cancer scientists believe are responsible for the majority of human cancers in the United States." Report Issued By The Environmental Defense Fund

"Chlorine itself is not believed to be the problem. Scientists suspect that the actual cause of the bladder cancers is a group of chemicals that form as result of reactions between the chlorine and natural substances and pollutants in the water." (organic matter such as leaves and twigs.)

St. Paul Dispatch & Pioneer Press, December 17, 1987

"Chlorine has so many dangers it should be banned. Putting chlorine in the water supply is like starting a time bomb. Cancer, heart trouble, premature senility, both mental and physical, are conditions attributable to chlorine treated water supplies. It is making us grow old before our time by producing symptoms of aging such as hardening of the arteries."

(Schwartz 2000 in Harrison 2000; Thornton and Halle 2000)

All the evidences given above indicates that there also more risks with drinking chlorinated water. Pure natural water is safe, but can be hardly found. In addition, it is very expensive that the majority cannot afford. Therefore I find the mistake by Lilongwe water board not to use Chlorine due to financial limitation for the past three week a blessing not a curse.

Several sources recommend the use of additional purification strategies in case where chlorine is used, just remove Chlorine and its byproducts again. Unfortunately, these are not known in Malawi, let alone people dying due to lack of knowledge.

The method to make chlorinated water safe include:

· filter it with granular activated carbon (GAC) or other suitable chemical-removing filter media, such as KDF (Harrison 2000)

· Activated carbon filters can be used to remove chlorine and its by-products.(Health Canada)

In concluding, it is prudent and fair that service providers be honest on how they are carrying out their services. Consumers should be given all information – negative and positive, that they can make informed decision. Monitoring of the service providers like, mainly those which enjoy monopoly like LWB, BWB, ESCOM should be enhanced, to ensure that the safety of the residents. The University of Malawi should be carrying out meaningful research and disseminates the results to the public to add knowledge. In not proper that every time to hear about UNIMA, it is either lecture strike or student strike. Civil society should put more effort where the lives of residents are at risk not only in politics. I thought right to safe water is a human right!!! Do CAMA and MBS still exists. It is high time they tackle their agendas objectively but also with a sophisticated approach to force out the mal-practice of the service providers. I think the investigative officer from these organizations should be tipping the reporters for news not otherwise. Ownership of the water boards should be revised. Though am not sure, safety of residents is only assured is the technocrats in the water boards are answerable to the residents not politicians. Lessons can be drawn from other countries like Netherlands and elsewhere!! When residents form board of directors not political appointees, performance of the board is improved.

When all is said and done, there is death at the tap! Non chlorinated water is a blessing not a curse. On the contrary, non chlorinated water is a scandal! Particularly in rain season, it is a rapid strategy of de-populating the cities!

References

Harrison, S. (2000). "Chlorine, http://www.bidness.com/esd/cl2facts.htm." Environmental System Distributing Vineman.

Health Canada. "Drinking Water Chlorination, http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/index-eng.php."

Pure Earth Technologies. "Health effects of Chlorine in Drinking water - http://www.pure-earth.com/chlorine.html."

Thornton, J., and Halle, M. (2000). "Chlorinated tap water linked to birth deffects." The Electronic Telegraph, London.

Oh its raining again!!!

As rain season is about to begin in Malawi, ofcourse some part have started receiving rain already, I would like to appeal on the following issues:
  • We should all cooperate to avoid water carried, related and borne diseases
  • Water harvesting technologies should be encouraged so that we can harvest more water for use after rains.
  • Crossing of full rivers or streams should be avoided.
  • We should all remember our parents by providing them better accommodation.
  • It will be prudent to plant with the first rains.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Seeking Africa's green revolution

From the begging bowl to the bread basket: in just two years, Malawi has gone from famine to food surplus - according to national statistics.

Smallholder farmers are being given access to new crop breeds; fertilisers; irrigation systems; and new techniques in crop rotation and soil management.

Agro-science is helping families to cope with climate change and helping Malawi to buck the trend in neighbouring African countries.

BBC science and environment reporter James Morgan has gone into the field to meet the families who are sowing the seeds of what is being hailed as "a uniquely African green revolution".

TUESDAY 07 OCTOBER - RISING FROM THE ASHES
Women banging drums (Image: BBC)
The dance traditionally celebrates a successful harvest
The women of Mnduka village are pounding their drums.

Under the shade of a mango tree, a crowd is gathering around a masked man, who is twisting, thrashing, throwing himself at the dust, over and over again.

He appears possessed - demonic, even. But everyone is cheering him. This isn't an exorcism, it's a celebration.

"Gule Wamkulu" - literally the "Big Dance" - traditionally marks the end of a successful harvest.

The masked figure is either a spirit, an animal, or a ghost - everyone I ask spins me a different spooky yarn. But what they all agree on, is that he has risen from the graveyard, "and he is very, very happy".

Happy as everyone here in Mnduka village has been at harvest time, I am told, since the fertiliser subsidy programme began.

I came to Mnduka to find out whether Malawi's much trumpeted "green revolution" is science fact or romantic fiction.

Despite claims of a "food surplus", a national newspaper today carries a front page story warning of impending food shortages in six regions, affecting 1.5m Malawians - about one tenth of the population.

Man operating a foot irrigation pump (Image: BBC)
Pump priming - irrigation drastically improves crop yields

Three years ago, Mnduka was a dustbowl too. The drought of 2005 was as harsh here as anywhere in Malawi.

Among the farmers, a quick show of hands reveals the vast majority were already growing high yielding varieties of hybrid maize. But without access to affordable fertiliser, their family stockpiles ran out in three months.

"Every day, we had to look for work just to eat that night, says Esther Chirwa, 28, who supports a household of five.

"We were living from hand to mouth."

"I travelled far and wide just to find food," says Nixon, 58, who harvested only 10 bags, which had to feed a family of six for a year.

"When you are away for so long, your family suffers."

Today, as we are led between the maize fields, the place has the feel of an African fairytale.

Down by the murky brown stream, the local farmers take turns to sweat it out on the irrigation pedal foot pump - mercifully shaded by bushes.

The field alongside - once scrubland - is now blossoming into a small oasis of peppers and maize - "the garden" they call it.

The idea is simple - one village garden will train a hundred farmers how to irrigate.

The foot pump and simple water piping were funded by an NGO, but across Malawi, it is the government which has taken the lead irrigation, with an ambitious program to create a "green belt" stretching along the shores of Lake Malawi.

Girl in maize field (Image: BBC)
Lost in the maize - a girl shows off crops grown with help of irrigation

"Remember - with irrigation, you can harvest three maize crops a year," says Phyness Thembulembu from US-based NGO Citizens Network for Foreign Affair (CNFA).

Meanwhile, over on the hillside, the farmers are teaching each other how to plant cassava - a drought resistant alternative to maize.

"The crop is common in other areas of the country, but back in 2005, very few here were growing it," says Phyness. "After the drought, they had to think again".

But the centrepiece of the village model is the agrodealer. A local shopkeeper has been given grants and technical training to advise farmers on fertilisers and hybrid seeds.

The shop is one of several thousand in a national a program funded by AGRA, and implemented here in Mnduka by CNFA.

"In the past, the farmers had to travel 18km to access the high yielding varieties (CNFA has a target of 5km) - an expensive and time consuming trip, when you are struggling to support a household of six or seven," says Matthews Matale, an agrodealer from a neighbouring town.

Now the seeds are on their doorstep. With support from CNFA, the agrodealer holds annual crop demonstrations and the farmers choose the seed variety they favour.

"The most popular in my shop," says Dinah Kapizan, "are the maize seeds that come in animal varieties - monkeys, elephants and lions.

"Monkeys are the quickest to maturity, the elephants next, and then the longest, but with the greatest yields, are the lions."

A clever marketing ploy, but it's simpler than remembering the difference between MH18 and DK8A31. I for one, am grateful.

Dinah Kapizan, and agrodealer (Image: BBC)
A bag of monkey or elephant? Seed varieties get easy to remember names

Esther, too is grateful for the seeds, the shorter travelling distance to the agrodealer, and most importantly, the subsidies.

"It's clear we are having bigger harvests now, with the fertiliser. I am able to sell some. The only thing I fear for is what happens if they take the subsidy away."

The dependency cannot be underestimated. The biggest round of applause under the mango tree was not for the wild ghost-man dancing, but for the local headman - when he called for fertiliser to be stocked here in the village, like the seeds.

"My worry though, is can this really be sustainable in the long term?", says France Gondwe, of Malawi's World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).

"The Nitrogen fertiliser is a quick fix - but without it, the harvest is low, because the soils are suffering from years of [monoculture]. Even with the fertiliser, they are not performing to their full potential.

"There are alternatives to fertiliser - crop rotation, manure, agroforestry. But with the food shortages, the government is trapped. And so the people are trapped too."

Back under the mango tree, the mysterious masked man takes a bow and races off through the crowd, and over the hill in the direction of the graveyard.

Mnduka too has risen from the graveyard - but the dancing goes on, for now at least.

MONDAY 06 OCTOBER - MAIZE EVERYWHERE
Sacks of maize (Image: Jeff Haskins)

Piled 19 bags high; when I say bags, I'm talking about the kind of sacks you can dam rivers with.

I tried lifting one. At 50kg, that was a big mistake. I left that to the army of youngsters with Popeye biceps, who were loading Malawi's mammoth maize harvest onto lorries, bound for government sales depots around the country.

"If you came here just a few years ago, you would find this storage depot totally empty," says Feckson Kantonga, operations manager for the government-sponsored Agriculture Development and Marketing Corporation (Admarc).

Boys carrying sacks of maize (Image: BBC)
The locals made carrying 50kg bags of maize look easy

Feckson is standing at the foot of a pile of maize as tall a house. He has put his best suit on to welcome a Kenyan film crew, who had come from Nairobi to find out the secret of Malawi's success.

How exactly can it be, they are wondering, that their prosperous nation has come to depend on little old Malawi (the 13th poorest nation in the world) to supply its staple food crop?

"Malawi?" asks Peter, a business journalist. "We Kenyans know nothing of Malawi. I had to look the place up on Google to find out what the heck was going on here."

The answer is hidden inside the sacks. They are fat-packed with new hybrid corn varieties - strains that were unheard of in Malawi a decade ago.

Bred by multinationals in Malawi, or crop centres in Zimbabwe and Sudan, the plants are high-yielding and fast-growing - plants with bigger cobs and shorter maturation periods.

With global warming, it is essential the plants make the most of any rains while they last - "a crop for every drop", to quote the motto of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra).

Bags of fertiliser (Image: BBC)
The high-yield crops have a large appetite for fertiliser

But the most popular hybrid varieties are those that remain "poundable". That is, the grains can still be beaten into flour in the traditional way.

"Are you telling me you have you never pounded maize, James?" smiles Cathy, a Kenyan journalist, with a cheeky wink.

"You know in Kenya, a woman is not considered fit enough to be a bride until she can pound a bag of maize. And a boy is not a man until he can build a house."

Where does that leave me? Still out of breath from lifting the maize sack.

And it is not only maize. There are hybrids for every local crop - cassava, sweet potato, soya, ground nuts and legumes.

But the most remarkable thing about these "miracle seeds" is that many are not new at all.

"They have been with us for decades, but they never made it to the fields," says Agra's Fred Muhhuku, an expert on agronomics in East Africa.

"Traditionally, farmers have either been too poor or too afraid to take a chance on these new varieties, even though they can triple their yields," he explained.

"If they plant their hardy traditional strains, they know that come drought or flood, some crop will survive to harvest. The harvest will be tiny - maybe 800kg per hectare - but it is guaranteed, so they take no chances."

Handfuls of maize (Image: BBC)
Farmers sell their surplus and buy animals with the proceeds

The result was six successive years of food shortage in Malawi - beginning in 2000.

"And there was no lack of rains, I can tell you," says Dr Jeffrey Luhanga, technical co-ordinator at the Ministry for Agriculture.

"I experienced the famine in 2005; there were lines of people queuing for food aid.

"The thing you have to remember is that these were the ones who were still strong enough to walk to the depots. The hungriest - the ones who really needed the food - they were stuck at home, starving.

"Now look around Malawi, you see only healthy faces. Yes, this is a green revolution. And it is being driven by science."

He reels off a list of programmes - irrigation, agronomy, planting patterns, science-based economic practices.

"These technologies have been in our research institutes for years, but they went nowhere. Now, for the first time, the technology is in the farmers' hands."

Seeds of hope?

It begins with the seeds. The hybrid maize varieties are high yielding - around 2,500kg/hectare or more.

"I grew 80 bags this year, in the land just around my house. Eighty bags!" says Mitengo Gamr, one of Admarc's regional managers.

"My family no longer queues to buy food."

But they come with a catch - they are addicted to costly nitrogen fertiliser.

"But it is worth the investment," explains Muhhuku, "because the extra maize you grow, you can sell to pay for the fertiliser, buy an animal for your farm and diversify. You can build security."

And what if the rains fail? "Then you have enough left over from your big harvest last year," he smiles.

Sacks of maize being loaded on to a lorry (Image: BBC)
Other African nations are looking at Malawi's maize boom with interest

"It's true, it's a different way of farming and it takes some convincing."

The other drawback is what is known as post-harvest management. The hybrids yield more flour, but the grains are less resistant to worms and weevils.

"In some places, you lose 40% of your storage," says Muhhuku.

The answer, inevitably, is pesticides, another expensive input. The margins are still favourable, but what if you can't afford to invest in the first place?

This is where the Malawian government has stepped in. A month or two from now, 1.5m of the poorest subsistence farmers will begin arriving at Admarc's depots, clutching four coupons: one for seeds, two for fertilisers and another for legumes. This year, for the first time, pesticides will be subsidised too.

It's an enormous cost burden for a developing economy to bear - which is why the past, African governments have preferred to rely on private investment and foreign aid.

Malawi has gambled - and last year, the reward was millions of dollars of maize export revenues.

"I am just back from New York, from a UN conference, where they had an entire session dedicated to Malawi," beams Dr Luhanga.

"Other African countries - they want to know if they can follow our example. Kenya, Tanzania, Swaziland - they are thinking of introducing subsidies. This green revolution - it is truly for the whole of Africa."

Where is the catch? Certainly, the revolution has not stopped the market price of maize from doubling in a year - from 30 kwachas (£0.12) per kilogram to 60 kwachas.

The government, controversially, has passed a law capping the price at 52 kwachas - an emergency measure.

But utter the words "technological dependency" to Muhhuku, and he simply shakes his head.

"We hear this accusation from western development workers. We are told 'why make farmers buy seeds every year? Why let the companies trap you?' But this is based on a misunderstanding. Storing the hybrid seeds - it takes a lot of technical knowledge.

"The farmers can stick to their traditional ways. But the yields are not worth their sweat."

Tomorrow, I will meet the farmers and ask them myself.

SUNDAY 05 OCTOBER - SIZING UP MALAWI'S MIRACLE
roadside sellers
Although there is plenty it does not come cheaply

"If [environmentalists] lived for just one month among the misery of the developing world, as I have for 50 years, they'd be crying out for tractors and fertiliser and irrigation canals."

So said Norman Borlaug, one of the founding fathers of the original Green Revolution - credited with wiping out starvation in Asia.

But can technology really be the saviour of Africa's struggling farmers? It has become a terribly unfashionable opinion in the UK, where "green" campaigners are no longer content to denounce GM crop trials. They simply rip them up.

"Responsible biotechnology is not the enemy," said Borlaug. "Starvation is."

I have decided to take Norm up on his wager, by coming to Malawi to see for myself.

Because no matter how many UN reports I've ploughed through, grasping the root cause of the current "food crisis" in Africa is anything but straightforward.

And neither is my journey to Malawi - a sweaty overnight haul which takes me via Kenya, Zambia, and several re-runs of Indiana Jones films. But for heroic inspiration, I look instead to a speech by Kofi Annan, the new chairman of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra) - a $200m, pan-African programme, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller foundations.

"Let us generate a uniquely African Green revolution," says Annan, cutting a heroic pose on my crumpled transcript. "There is nothing more important than this."

It is difficult to argue. Over the last 50 years, African farmers have laboured in the heat, while countries like Mexico, India and the Philippines have undergone a green revolution - applying novel fertilisers and pesticides to churn out bumper harvests of new high-yield varieties of wheat and rice.

Empowering farmers

Meanwhile, Africa has been cultivating greater and greater poverty statistics.

Sub-Saharan Africa is the only region in the world where per capita food production has steadily declined.

The harvests have been great, but still the food prices in Malawi are still rocketing
Malcolm Fleming

One third of Africans are malnourished. Soils are among the most depleted on Earth. Farmers do not have access to productive seed varieties and those that do have neither the knowledge nor the tools to reap the harvest. Slash and burn still reigns.

Climate change is forecasting ever more variable rainfalls, and more frequent droughts. Add in soaring fuel prices and the scourge of HIV/Aids, and the average African finds himself surrounded in the kind of perilous predicament which from which even Harrison Ford would struggle to escape.

But it is this very challenge that has drawn the world's crop scientists and agro-economists to Malawi. They hope to pioneer novel farming systems that propel Africa towards a new era of food security.

It has already been dubbed by members of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as "a greener revolution".

"Greener" because it works with ecosystems, not against them. A revolution that is "pro-poor and pro-environment", in the words of Mr Annan.

The talk around the conference tables is of "empowering" subsistence farmers to find their own, local solutions - farming techniques which are sustainable, affordable and tailored to local soils, markets and eating preferences.

Over the next week, I'll be taking a look at these projects first hand - catching fish in the desert, planting strange trees in the middle of maize crops.

I'm wondering how women and men, who have been sowing the same maize seeds for generations, really feel about the new hybrid varieties of seeds which are more nutritious, but also more hungry for expensive pesticide and fertiliser.

'Against the grain'

Most of all, I'm curious to find out whether the "miracle" we have read about here in Malawi is bona fide or illusory. Is the revolution underway, or a simple matter of better rainfall?

The facts are these. During the last decade, Malawi suffered six successive years of food shortage, culminating in 2005. One third of the population - 4.5million people - went hungry.

Step forward two years, and Malawi is exporting more than one million metric tonnes of maize, its staple crop.

Malawian boys
High food prices haven't dampened their joy yet

The government, against the advice of the IMF and the World Bank, has handed out vouchers to 1.5m of the country's poorest farmers, enabling them to buy "inputs" - seeds, fertiliser and pesticides. Meanwhile, yields have mushroomed. Malawians are selling maize to Kenya and giving food aid to Zimbabwe.

The success was hailed last year with Oxfam's Malcolm Fleming describing to the BBC how Malawi was going against the grain of African agriculture.

So when I bump into Malcolm, a well-kent face in my native Scotland, on the flight to Lilongwe, I don't hesitate to offer a warm handshake of congratulations.

"I'm afraid that things have moved on since then," he sighs. "The harvests have been great, but still the food prices in Malawi are still rocketing."

Why? "That's the question," he continues. "The closer I look, the more complicated it becomes. But from what I gather, the maize is being sold abroad at greater prices, and that keeps the prices up in Malawi."

Malcolm is here doing research in the lead up to World Food Day on 16 October. Helping him to raise awareness is another familiar Scottish face, but I'm afraid I am sworn to secrecy. All will be revealed in due course.

"Rising food prices might not be much of a problem for me or you," says Mr Fleming, "but if you spend 80% of your household income on food, and then the price doubles..."

It is a welcome serving of realism pie to chew on as I step out of Lilongwe airport.

The pavements are covered in a blanket of purple blossom - it looks like a fairytale. And the boys cartwheeling down the red dirt roads seem full of beans. But the lumps in their bellies tell a different story.

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7651977.stm

Fish farming in Malawi's dustbowl

By James Morgan
Environment reporter, BBC News

Fish pond at Zomba West
Fish farmed in these ponds help keep the children of Zomba West healthy

This seems an unlikely place to go fishing for your dinner. The dusty scrublands of Zomba West have been brittle dry since April, when the rainy season ended.

The place is spookily deserted today - the funeral of the local chief. In the marketplace, we find only one stall open, run by children. And all they are selling is fish.

"When we first started fish farming - people thought it was mad - they told us it will never work here," says Esther Fikira.

She leads me to a series of dirty green ponds, dug into the baked clay soil.

The water is murky, almost stagnant, but Esther assures me there is a big haul of tasty "chambo" (a local delicacy) lurking just below the surface.

"If you had only seen the benefits this community has had from eating these fish," says the 50-year-old, wading in, "then you will know why I will never give my pond away."

Esther Fikira
Esther Fikira weeds out one of her fish ponds, in West Zomba

Dry county

There are now 700 fish farmers like Esther here in the bushland settlements to the west of Malawi's former colonial capital, Zomba.

You may have heard of the fiction novel Salmon Fishing in the Yemen. Well, this is the real thing - an ambitious food security project developed by the WorldFish Centre, a member of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

They are introducing small-scale aquaculture to ensure families in Malawi have enough food and income to buy maize - even in years when droughts affect their crops.

The project assists farmers by digging small, rain-fed ponds of about 10x15m on their land, or anywhere the soil is suitable for retaining water.

Families like Esther's use the ponds to rear common fish species - which in Malawi means chambo (a species of tilapia) and mlamba (catfish).

At WorldFish's local headquarters, just along the road, Dr Daniel Jamu and his team of scientists are breeding new varieties of chambo - selected to grow fast, fat, and feed happily on whatever waste is left over from households.

Esther uses manure from her goats and chickens to keep the pond high in nutrients which allow plankton to thrive. The fish eat the plankton, and when they grow to full size, they are harvested, usually every six months.

Farmed fish for sale at roadside market
Fish are now a source of income for families in West Zomba

Trading up

She sells most of her fish - raising enough money to buy maize when the harvest is poor, and to help feed and clothe the orphaned children she takes in.

"Before we had the ponds, this area suffered from a lot of poverty," she explains. "We didn't eat meat, and we lacked any source of income.

"But with the coming of the fish ponds, we had so much leftover to sell, I had enough money left over to buy fertiliser, with the government subsidy."

When the ponds are emptied, a rich layer of silt can be dug from the base - to use as fertiliser. Esther uses hers to grow maize, which in turn ensures that her goats and chickens keep popping out manure for the pond.

It's a perfect circle. "Or what we call an integrated agriculture-aquaculture (IAA) system," says Joseph Nagoli, of WorldFish. "This isn't high input fish farming. This is simple and sustainable."

Previous attempts to introduce aquaculture in Malawi have failed, he says, "because people who took up fish farming thought there was no longer any need to grow maize. The message was wrong. Now we see fish is just one part of a family's agriculture".

Their latest research project aims to quantify the nutritional value of different species of tilapia.

Soil from the ponds is used as fertiliser
Silt from the fish ponds is used to keep soils fertile for crop planting

Healthy harvest

The fish supply essential protein, calcium, and vitamin A - essential for children and the elderly, and those with HIV/Aids.

Almost one-fifth of Malawians aged 15-49 are infected, and each year tens of thousands die of the disease.

But good nourishment can prolong the life of HIV/Aids patients by up to eight years, according to research by the World Health Organisation.

WorldFish has introduced aquaculture to 1,200 HIV affected families in Malawi - doubling their average annual income and increasing their intake of fish by 150%.

Esther has already seen the impacts first hand.

"The nutritional impact of the fish was very obvious - on the children, the elderly, and most especially on those with HIV/Aids," she says.

"I have a neighbour who was very sick. Now she is able to work in the fields - to make a living."

The challenge now, says Nagoli, is to expand aquaculture from "a sector to an industry". WorldFish has a target of 8,000 households in Malawi - equivalent to 40,000 people.

Daniel Jamu
Daniel Jamu oversees tilapia breeding at the WorldFish research centre

Fortunately, there is already a healthy appetite for fish among the country's 11 million population. Malawi may be landlocked, but it has had a thriving fishing industry, based largely in Lake Malawi and Lake Chilwa.

"It may surprise you to know, that the biggest source of protein for Malawians is not chicken or beef, but fish," says Dr Jeffrey Luhanga, technical controller of Malawi's Ministry of Agriculture.

"We have a policy - a fish every day."

But just as staple crops are under threat from climate change and over-intensive farming practices, so too is Malawi's fishing industry.

Out of stock

Lake Chilwa provides around 20% of the country's catch - 17,000 tonnes - but at a depth of just 7m, it is highly vulnerable to drought - having completely dried up as recently as 1995.

"Nobody knows what will happen with climate change," concedes Mr Nagoli.

Meanwhile, the lake's fish stocks are already suffering from over-fishing and environmental degradation.

The lake's resident population of fishermen - who live in floating reed huts, on the marshy shorelines of Chisi island - are watching their livelihoods evaporate.

As dusk falls, I cross to the island by motor boat, weaving through the reeds, until we find a fire alight in one of the floating huts.

"The catch is not good," says Mr Irons - an elderly veteran, who uses traps to catch his tilapia. "The other fishermen use nets, and they are taking all the catch. I get bigger fish, but I don't get as many."

He worries for his family. They live miles away and he sees them very rarely. If the stocks dry up, he won't have any income to support them.

WorldFish are working to introduce sustainable fishing practices - to ensure the survival of both the fish and the fishermen.

"Urban" fish farming could be the key to their success in the longterm - by easing the burden on Lake Chilwa's precious natural resources.

"You know the old saying," says Dr Luhanga. "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.

"Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7683748.stm

Friday, October 24, 2008

Cabinet passes sanitation policy

Cabinet passes sanitation policy
BY KANDANI NGWIRA
09:13:42 - 23 October 2008

Cabinet has finally nodded to the Sanitation Policy, a provision that would give the Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development enforcement mechanisms on sanitation especially in the provision of clean water to Malawians.

Principal Secretary for Irrigation and Water Ministry Andrina Mchiela disclosed this Tuesday when she officially opened a three-week training workshop for district officers on ‘sustainable community management of rural water supply, sanitation and hygiene.

Mchiela said although Malawi registered promising strides in the provision of potable water to about 74.2 percent, the country was critically lagging behind on sanitation.

“Although the country is getting very close to meeting the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) target of 75 percent coverage by 2015 for access to safe water, a lot more needs to be done for the sanitation target of 70 percent,” said Mchiela.

“Only 46 percent of the population has access to improved sanitation facilities, she said.

Research has also revealed that safe hygiene practices have not been adopted on a wider scale in Malawi.

“For example, a Multi-Indicator Cluster Survey by the National Statistical Office (NSO) in 2006 indicates that hand washing, probably the most effective and inexpensive way to prevent water-borne diseases, is done on a meagre 2 percent at a time here in Malawi,” she added.

Mchiela said these statistics show that Malawi does not have complete coverage of both potable water and sanitation services for its people.

However, she said things would now change for the better with the sanitation policy, which would have regulatory rules and enforcement mechanism on sanitation.

Mchiela said the policy would enable the ministry to introduce a directorate on sanitation that would particularly look into the collection of sewer and garbage in urban areas.

“Through the sanitation policy, all responsibility on sewer collection has been wrestled from city assemblies and would now come under water boards in the urban areas.

“On the other hand, garbage collection would remain the responsibility of the city assemblies but they would be closely supervised by personnel from the sanitation directory,” she said.

The workshop is intended to equip participants with professional expertise to perform multi-skilled functions in order to increase access to sustainable water supply and sanitation services.

It is sponsored by Unicef with facilitators coming from Centre for Water, Sanitation, Health and Technology Development (WASHTED) headed by Geoffrey Chavula and experts from Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) of Loughborough University in United Kingdom

Souce: http://www.dailytimes.bppmw.com/article.asp?ArticleID=10961

Vegetable gardening improving livelihoods in northern Malawi

image John Themba: Fruit farmer

Surrounded by water and faced with sandy soils, the people of Likoma and Chizumulu Islands in the northern part of Lake Malawi never thought they could grow vegetables and other crops.

For years, they depended on produce and maize brought in from mainland Malawi and neighboring Mozambique.Since 2006, however, courtesy of the World Bank’s Civil Society Fund Program (CSFP), about 80 percent of the 17,000 islanders have access to vegetables and fruits grown on the two islands.

The program is being overseen by Lake Malawi Projects (Malawi) or LMPM. The group is leading the islanders in managing household gardens for balancing nutritional requirements while improving livelihoods.

Turning sand to soil

LPM estimates that before 2006 only 15 percent of the islanders grew vegetables seasonally. Now, in addition to vegetables being grown, according to LMPM Project Manager Mr. Alfred Phiri, there was also significant maize production in Likoma in 2007 because of the gardening project.

The World Bank has been funding LMPM since 2006 to demonstrate to the islanders how to make and sustain their own gardens all year round.

They now know what vegetables and fruits to cultivate, how to conserve soil, make compost and animal manure.

"We encourage organic manure because fertilizer is not a sustainable option," says Mrs. Flora Sajiwandani, Chairperson of the Agriculture Subcommittee of the LMPM Executive Board. "People here cannot afford fertilizer so we have to make maximum use of what is available naturally."

The people are also taught how to tend and interplant trefhosia, a nitrogen fixing shrub whose leaves are also used to make an insecticide to control garden pests. The locals call it mtetezi – meaning protector.

Food for consumption and for sale

Other than for home consumption, most of the households on the islands grow fruits and vegetables to generate income to meet other daily needs.

"The little that I generate from selling fruits enables me buy fish, maize, bread and soap," says 76 year-old John Themba of Mbungo Village in Likoma, who opted to specialize in growing fruits for sale. He is very proud of the jam he makes from his tomatoes.

In addition to a local market, most of the households sell their produce to the secondary school, hospital, and lodges on the island. Those who produce high value crops such as chilly peppers and beetroot also take them to mainland Malawi.

"The Likoma experience is a microcosm of what needs to happen all over Malawi," says Timothy Gilbo, the World Bank’s Country Manager for Malawi. "There is need to transfer knowledge to people and encourage them to do things differently. Specializing in a high-value crop at household level and trading it, is a good path out of poverty."

According to Gilbo, progress on the island shows that a little money with the right thinking and willingness to change can achieve a lot.

Households compete for progress

The Lake Malawi Project has reached out to the islanders with about $5000 from the World Bank’s Civil Society Fund (CSF) from 2006-2008. The CSF supports innovative ideas that empower poor and marginalized groups to take charge of development processes.

In addition to the funding, LMPM has also introduced trophy competitions for summer and winter cropping. Households register their gardens for the competition which assesses how households are managing their gardens based on the skills and knowledge gained from demonstration sessions. By July 2008, 256 households had registered for the 2008 winter competition.

Other households indicated that they have also taken up gardening encouraged by the change in the neighbors’ livelihoods. "In everyday terms it sounds like a very simple initiative, but it’s great for us here in Likoma because our lives are getting better," said Sajiwandani.

LMPM is one of the seven civil society organizations (CSOs) in Malawi the World Bank is supporting in 2008. The CSOs are implement projects in the agriculture, HIV/AIDS and governance areas amounting to $35,000.--World Bank Malawi

Source: http://www.nyasatimes.com/features/1677.html

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Energy Saver bulbs - An Answer to Blackouts?

Energy Saver bulb – An answer to blackouts?

Black out it is the no longer strange in Malawi. It is the order of the day. During rainy season it is because of load shedding. During the dry season it is another reason all together.

Many people have commented on the problem. Economists are very much worried on the revenues lost by industries and companies. Engineers blame the worn out equipment in our HEP stations and lack of adequate maintenance. Environmentalists push the blame on unsustainable land use practices, cultivation in the river bank and wanton cutting down of trees. Climatologist it’s a question of climate change which is being overlooked in the country.

There are many reasons which can be attached to the problem. Every school of thought has valid arguments. It is somehow interesting to note that all stakeholders are standing on different platform. If all stakeholders can come together – can we not find a lasting solution for the problem?

Energy is the driving force for development. Currently the country is moving in the right direction. There is conducive environment for establishment of industries and companies – political will, flourish microeconomic and macroeconomic environment. The drawback currently is unsustainable and irregular power supply.

However as a way to reduce power demand there has been a successful campaign to replace the ordinary bulbs with energy saver bulbs. Due the success of the campaign championed by ESCOM, business was created for the Asian community and local merchants. The country is mercilessly flooded with all kind of energy saver bulbs.

Having a liberal market, there are no limits as to what kind / type energy saver is best and suitable for our environment. Consumers have been cheated and ripped. Profits have been easily made by clever business person. Surprisingly ESCOM is just quite about the whole business. Other stakeholders have not even thought about this energy saver bulb business.

The question is – are the energy saver bulbs an answer to blackout? Are the energy saver bulbs just better than ordinary bulbs?It is true that energy saver bulb saves energy. Some may use only 20% of energy used by ordinary bulb. Economically, it is wise using them. They last longer but also cumulatively electrical tariff is reduced.It is wise to provide a full meal and understand the entire issues surrounding the energy saver bulbs. It is also true that energy saver bulbs contain tiny amount of mercury. Mercury is poisonous but it's also a necessary part of most compact fluorescent bulbs[1].

The known and proven effects of mercury include:·
  • Damages the kidney, liver and in sufficient amount cause death.·
  • Affects nervous system. Symptoms include these: tremors; emotional changes (e.g., mood swings, irritability, nervousness, excessive shyness); insomnia; neuromuscular changes (such as weakness, muscle atrophy, twitching); headaches; disturbances in sensations; changes in nerve responses; performance deficits on tests of cognitive function.
  • At higher exposures there may be kidney effects, respiratory failure and death[2].

This mercury is released when the bulb burned out or is broken. Considering the lack of legislation of waste disposal, it is recommended to disposal these bulbs separately. If the bulb is broken in the house, it is recommended that every person should leave the room. The windows should be opened for 15 – 30 minutes. Then with gloves all the trashes should be put in a plastic and safely deposited. Sadly due to insatiable appetite of money these issues are not revealed. I wonder where our consumer society is. May be it was gone with Honorable Kapito to HRCC. Innocent consumers are progressively dying because of lack of knowledge.

[1] http://www.reuters.com/article/inDepthNews/idUSN2744810520070327?pageNumber=1[2] http://www.epa.gov/hg/effects.htm#elem

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Irrigation is Development: Ethically a contradiction

Irrigation is Development: Ethically a Contradiction?

Introduction

Irrigation development is highly believed to be a vehicle of economic and infrastructure development to the rural areas in developing as well as developed countries. Irrigation has been favored over rain-fed agriculture due to gargantuan benefits it has managed to produce even in limiting circumstances. As by 1986, irrigated area covered only 18% of all cultivated land but contributes 33% of total harvest in the world (Yudelman, forthcoming cited in Repetto 1986:3)

The benefits if irrigated agriculture includes:

  • Creation of employment – employ more people as skilled or unskilled laborers starting from construction, operation and maintenance.
  • Increase productivity of the land. With irrigation it is possible to harvest three times within a year thus food security is ensured amidst escalating population increase over stagnant land size.
  • Reduce desertification

Therefore Irrigated agriculture has been an important contributor to the expansion of national and world food supplies since the 1960s and is expected to play a major role in feeding the growing world population[1].

Having this background, irrigation development has been biased considered positively in many occasions. There has been little or no critical consideration of the ethical problems it has caused. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss some of the ethical problems caused by irrigation. Ethical views used in this paper are deontological, utilitarianism and virtue as presented by van de Belt (forthcoming).


In this paper ethical problems of irrigation are systematically presented and discussed from their background to their multifaceted manifestation. For each section, suggested solutions to the problems and the consequences of the solutions are presented.

Four ethical problems identified include:

  • Non-interventionism of indigenous knowledge
  • Asymmetric the golden rule between people and environment
  • The paradox of handing over white elephants
  • Distending susceptibility of vulnerable groups

Non-interventionism of indigenous knowledge


In developing countries, poor farmers are the one dependent on government funded irrigation schemes. These farmers mostly are illiterate and suffer from high inferiority complex (not used to group discussion, speaking/negotiate at public meetings or sometime not comfortable with the language used) but they possess various water managing skills and knowledge worthy utilizing. Unfortunately irrigation engineer / designer due to their solid technical background have in many cases overlooked this important point. Worse still in many bureaucratic organizations (i.e. irrigation agencies) performance measurement of engineers is not based on how the system is performing but the quantity of structures constructed or areas being cultivated (Korten, 1989:131)


Boelens (draft) observed that “many irrigation projects show a rather strict separation between the technical and economic aspects, on the one hand, and the socio-organizational and normative issues, on the other.”


With this background local knowledge has not been fully utilized. There have been disregarded and irrigation system been designed to the preference of engineers only. Then irrigation systems are like foreign object in the community.

This problem has resulted into:

  • Irrigation systems are designed using theoretical principles and making them unsuitable to the local condition.
  • Local people fail to comprehend the management principles of the systems for sustainability. Therefore the systems collapse quickly.
  • Ownership of the system by the local people is not achieved.

Non involvement of local knowledge is against the principle of respect of autonomy. It is very unfair to impose a system on other people. What is supposed to be good for the other does not translate to be good to the other in reality.


The suggested solution includes interactive designing irrigation systems. Local people should be incorporated in the planning team at early stages rather than bring them in at the end of the project.

The gap is reduced between designers and local people the following results will be attained:

  • The irrigation system will be fully owned by the local people.
  • The capacity of the local people on irrigation system planning will be enhanced.
  • The irrigation system designed will be sustainable

Asymmetric the golden rule between people and environment

The golden rule states that whatsoever things you would want other men do to you, do you even so to them. Appling the same principle between people and environment there is huge incongruity in many irrigation systems. It is a known fact that human beings depend on nature and vice versa. Human being and nature should live in unity but this is not the case in most irrigation systems.


Sustainable irrigation development is possible only when environmentally sound designs are employed. The Irrigation engineers / designers know this requirement. Unfortunately many irrigation systems have been / are being designed disregarding this fundamental requirement for system sustainability and more importantly for the betterment of the community living in vicinity to the irrigation system.


Due to disregarding of environmental sound design, operation and management, there have been enormous problems affecting innocent local people. Considering Kantian ethics disregarding environmental fails under the three principles of reciprocity, rationality and freedom (van den Belt, ? : 5 – 9). Even more utilism speaking the action does not bring the greatest good for greatest number and under virtue ethics view this action (irrigation disregarding environment) is not highly valued and cannot promoted to be followed.


Flow of water has been reduced in the downstream compromising downstream users’ activities which are dependent on. Communities in the upstream have been highly exposed to water borne, related and carried diseases, flooding, accidents like children / livestock drawing in the water. Land degradation has been propagated living the downstream with fertile silts but highly susceptible to flood destruction. (Repetto, 1986:6)


On the contrary rapid environmental degradation can be avoided in irrigation system. If the golden rule is well balanced between people and environment, it is possible for irrigation to be environmentally friendly and in return the environment sustainably supports people’s activities.

The paradox of handing over white elephants


Irrigation scheme as seen as white elephants in two ways: when they are unwanted property (imposed on them) but not possible to be disposed (of course they are) and when local users realize less or none from the great expectation they had. They may be unwanted because of many problems including huge cost requirement and underperforming.


Up to 1980s many large scale irrigation schemes have been established with large funding from international financial organizations (Repetto 1986:4-7). And designs and the operations requirement mostly did not consider limited finances of the local people and assumption of continued flow of finances from international organizations through the government departments. Repetto (1986:1) support this idea by saying that in third world public irrigation is heavily subsidized.


On the contrary due to limited availability of finances at national level, funding to irrigation system has been reduced and irrigation agencies have been under pressure to ensure that irrigation systems are self sustaining.


Aiming at self sustaining irrigation operation, most governments now are handing over the irrigation schemes fully to the local farmers or they jointly manage them – what is termed as cost-sharing.


The handing over of these irrigation systems, which were constructed not aiming at increasing productivity, to rural poor people who are interested in increasing productivity is a huge contradiction. The assumption is that local farmers will financially sustain the project. On contrary evidence shows that benefits from large scale irrigation is much lower that the operation and maintenance cost.


Therefore handing over non-productive irrigation systems to the farmers put them in another poverty trap. In this case local people have been used as means for national irrigation agencies to be applauded by the international agencies and thereafter continued support.


For smooth transfer of irrigation to the farmers, evidently under pressure from International donor agencies and operating within limited funding, the governments have do not declare their interest. Instead they disguise the whole process with new terminology of participatory irrigation management, decentralization, power to the people etcetera .


This action of the most governments in developing countries is against the principle of non-maleficence, principle of beneficence and the principle of justice. The local people are excited to take over the management of the system not fully aware of the negative implications on their livelihood economically and even social relation.

The following suggestions may help to overcome this problem:

  • The governments in developing countries should not blindly copy and paste recommendations from international organizations. Each situation should be assessed differently and realistic solutions should be enacted.
  • The objectives of the irrigation systems should be analyzed properly before handing them over to the local farmers. Welfare irrigation systems should still be managed by the governments but productive irrigation systems can be handed over to the farmers. The governments should fulfill is social obligations.
  • The government and government agencies should be honest in executing their duties. All necessary information should be provided to the local people so that people should make informed decision is taking over the management of the irrigation systems.

Following the above suggested mitigation measures the following results may be achieved:

  • Trust will be established between government and the local people.
  • Handed over irrigation system will be managed sustainably. There will be few or no cases of local people abandoning irrigation schemes which they willingly accepted.
  • The local farmers will not deteriorate further while involved in what ought to be a productive enterprise – irrigation.
  • The government will continue to fulfill its social obligation and destitute poor will be fully supported.
  • The government agencies will be responsible enough to request funding for properly design irrigation systems, thus which are productive and which can be easily handed over to the local people.

Distending susceptibility of vulnerable groups


In developing countries, constructions of irrigation systems have been done with different forms of remuneration. In some cases the systems are constructed under food for work, in other cases under cash for assets programs. However in most cases the local communities are requested to contribute their labor freely if at all the infrastructure is constructed in their area.


This requirement has led many local leaders forcing their subjects to participate in projects. Each household is forced to be represented on daily basis for the construction of the irrigation infrastructure. Each household in the community is not allowed to make free decision to participate or not. Failure to participate is followed with all sorts of punishment.


Labor is contributed disregarding the type, vulnerability, size and irrigation interesting of the household. The rich household end up hiring out labor to represent them or sometime they contribute money. They invest their personal labor to other productive activities which directly ensures increased wellbeing of their household. On the other hand the poor household (female headed household, child headed household, the aged and chronically ill household) are forced to use the labor which could otherwise be used on productive household activities.


Making matters worse the rich households benefit more from the irrigation system (Wegerich, forthcoming a; Wegerich forthcoming b, Wegerich, 2006). They manage to cultivate large area – but also better areas within irrigation scheme (upstream or near the main canal) and are able to use all necessary agricultural inputs. On the contrary the poor household barely benefits from the intervention apart from casual labor where they are poorly paid.


In all fairness this scenario should be avoided in irrigation projects. The gap between the poor and rich is increased. The vulnerable groups are deteriorated further and fully manipulated by the rich household. This is against the golden rule, the principle of beneficence the principle of justice and principle of nonmaleficence.


This predicament can be avoided by proper targeting. The destitute poor household should always be under government social obligation. When irrigation agencies request community to make contribution towards irrigation system construction they should also put guidelines to protect exploitation of poor households. The irrigation agencies should also monitor the contribution to ensure adherence to the guidelines.


The removal of this glitch reduces the gap between the poor and the rich. Exploitation of the poor household by the elite, powerful and rich stakeholders will be reduced. Vulnerability of the poor household will not deteriorate further.

Conclusion

The whole idea that irrigation is development is mercilessly raped when ethical issues are overlooked in the process of its design, implementation and operation.
As argued by Mollinga and Vincent (1996) “irrigation is a contradictory phenomenon with great socio-economic importance, with many negative impacts, but also with enormous potential for improving people’s livelihood. The question is not to be for it or against it, but how to use it constructively.”


All stakeholders involved in irrigation should have broad view on other implication of irrigation intervention. Ethical issues should be interwoven with technical, social, political principles.

References

Belt van den H (?) Introduction to Ethics: three varieties of moral reasoning, Wageningen University
Boelens R (draft) Lecture Notes ‘Design as an organization process, Wageningen University
Korten F.F. (1989) “From Bureaucratic to Strategic Organization” In: Korten F.F and Siy R Y ed., Transforming a Bureaucracy: The experience of the Philippine national irrigation administration, Quezon City: Aleneo de Manila University press, p.131
Mollinga P. P and Vincent L (1996) Irrigation, Development, Irrigation and Development
Repetto R (1986) Skimming the Water: Rent Seeking and the Performance of Public Irrigation System, Research report No. 4, World Research Institute, Washington
Wegerich K (2006) The hidden urban tail-enders – drinking water supply as a common pool resource problem in Khorezm, Uzbekistan, Wageningen University and Research Centre.
Wegerich K (forthcoming a) Poverty reduction: what has irrigation to do with it? Wageningen University and Research Centre
Wegerich K (forthcoming b) Opening the “black box” on the concept of equity: examples from the Amu Darya. Wageningen University and Research Centre
[1]http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/CABI_Publications/CA_CABI_Series/Water_Productivity/Unprotected/0851996698ch10.pdf